https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088696

José Matos <jama...@fc.up.pt> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |fedora-review+



--- Comment #3 from José Matos <jama...@fc.up.pt> ---
I placed the review text above and I have the short here because, at least to
me, it is easier to read.

The problems with installation above are due to me using F-20 as the build root
and octave-netcdf is not available there. On the other hand octave-statistics
it is still in review and there was no explicit dependency between both
reviews. I will take it and fix this issue. :-)

Regarding the second issue, COPYING is packaged but not marked as %doc and the
guidelines imply, as far as I read it, that it _must_ be done.

Since you are the responsible for most of the octave guidelines I trust on this
issue to fix it or to take any other action about it.

This package is APPROVED. (sorry I did not meant to shout. :-) )

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to