https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099269
--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) <panem...@gmail.com> --- Review: + Package builds successful in F21 x86_64 mock + rpmlint on generated rpms gave drupal7-admin_theme.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Drupal -> Drupe drupal7-admin_theme.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Drupal -> Drupe drupal7-admin_theme.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/drupal7-admin_theme/LICENSE.txt drupal7-admin_theme.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Drupal -> Drupe drupal7-admin_theme.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Drupal -> Drupe 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. + Source verified with upstream as (sha256sum) srpm tarball: ab3b742c9854ddad5862e197b17bcc2bc655a5f101df7ab31a055c0e7f25c00f upstream tarball : ab3b742c9854ddad5862e197b17bcc2bc655a5f101df7ab31a055c0e7f25c00f + License is valid GPLv2+ and included in its own text file LICENSE.txt + Package follows drupal7 packaging guidelines Suggestions: 1) Group tag is not necessary in Fedora now and can be removed from spec file. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Group_tag 2) Buildroot tag is not needed. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag 3) File upstream bug/ticket to correct the FSF address in LICENSE.txt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
