https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122577
--- Comment #4 from Fabio Alessandro Locati <fabioloc...@gmail.com> --- I've to agree with Christopher that the way you tagged is weird, even because if the upstream version is 1.1-1, would be wrong to tag the Fedora Package as 1.1-1, since it should be tagged as 1.1-1-1 (I'm not suggesting to do it, I'm only saying that the coherence is needed). Since we are talking about the versioning of the project... where did the 1.0 is/was/have been? I think the wikipedia page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_versioning has a lot of great ideas and suggestions on how to tag a software. Every method is acceptable (some software are not tagged at all), but some methods are easier to be managed by the packagers and by the users. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
