https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1107127
--- Comment #7 from Dave Love <d.l...@liverpool.ac.uk> ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #5)
> > I notice that the RPM tries to use the user dlove.
>
> It would be similar with your own src.rpm packages, because it's entirely
> normal for the included files to be owned by the user that builds the
> src.rpm, e.g. "mockbuild" or your ordinary user account.
Yes, and presumably the version that's eventually distributed will be
different anyhow. The tarball will have arbitrary file ownerships too.
> %doc
>
> An empty %doc line makes no sense, since it's a no-op.
Thanks. It wasn't meant to be empty.
> > %{_mandir}/man1/procenv.1.gz
>
> Not a big issue, but prefer
>
> %{_mandir}/man1/procenv.1*
>
> to allow for disabled/changed/customized compression of manual pages.
Yes, that's what I do these days. Now I've got space there, I've uploaded new
versions to:
https://loveshack.fedorapeople.org/review/procenv-0.35-3.el6.src.rpm
https://loveshack.fedorapeople.org/review/procenv.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
