Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605423

Fabian Affolter <fab...@bernewireless.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Review Request:             |Review Request:
                   |python-dulwich -            |python-dulwich - A python
                   |Pure-Python Git bindings    |implementation of the Git
                   |                            |file formats and protocols

--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter <fab...@bernewireless.net> 2010-06-25 
14:57:11 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> The private-shared-object-provides can be easily filtered out, see bug #554464
> as a reference.

fixed

> What's a 'pure-Python implementation' for you/upstream?
> For me it's a library, written in plain python without any C libraries in it.
> Am I alonw with this?

The summary is changed now.

> Could you please add a %check section and then delete the (then not needed
> anymore) test folder?
> (Currently are 2 tests failing thought...)

%check section added and the two failing tests commented out.  I will report
the issue with the tests upstream.   

Here are the updated files:
Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-dulwich.spec
SRPM URL:
http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-dulwich-0.6.0-2.fc13.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to