https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131284
--- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember <kalevlem...@gmail.com> --- Yes, the naming here is not ideal. tpopela discussed different naming options with upstream last week and they advised us to go with webkitgtk4: 11:40 <tpopela> <KaL> in webkitgtk3, 3 is not for gtk, but the wk binary version 11:40 <tpopela> <KaL> so I would use webkitgtk4 11:40 <tpopela> <KaL> don't use webkit2gtk4 for the name of the package 11:41 <tpopela> so we should really go for webkitgtk4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
