https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128384
--- Comment #2 from Josef Stribny <jstri...@redhat.com> --- Thanks for the informal review. > Package doesn't match the upstream: Did you compare it with the right released tag (2.2.1)[1] or with master? I didn't do any modifications to those files. I added this step to the specfile's comments so it's clearer now. > Consistent use of macros: I united the macros and changed the paths without macros to use them. > Rpmlint This is how the obs-sign is designed to be run by upstream. Do you have any concrete objection on what rpmlint says? Spec URL: http://data-strzibny.rhcloud.com/obs/obs-signd.spec SRPM URL: http://data-strzibny.rhcloud.com/obs/obs-signd-2.2.1-2.src.rpm Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7438778 [1] https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-sign/tree/2.2.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
