https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517
--- Comment #54 from Milan Bouchet-Valat <nalimi...@club.fr> --- I'm eventually going to use LLVM 3.4 instead of requiring a new llvm3.3 package. Julia developers are willing to support several versions of LLVM, including 3.4 and 3.5. So the package is ready for the final review (at last! ;-). Anyone willing to take it? http://nalimilan.perso.neuf.fr/transfert/julia.spec http://nalimilan.perso.neuf.fr/transfert/julia-0.3.0-1.fc20.src.rpm (Will require dSFMT from Bug 1108765) > rpmlint SPECS/julia.spec > 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/julia-* > julia.x86_64: E: devel-dependency dSFMT-devel As explained above, currently needed, but should be fixed in the future. > julia.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath > /usr/lib64/julia/libjulia-debug.so ['$ORIGIN'] > julia.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/julia/libjulia.so > ['$ORIGIN'] This is required because Julia loads its own private library, and it works fine. > julia-debuginfo.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/src/debug/tmp 01777L No idea about this one, as it's automatically done by debugging symbols extraction... > julia-devel.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath > /usr/lib64/julia/libjulia-debug.so ['$ORIGIN'] Same as above. > julia-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/share/man/man1/julia-debug.1.gz julia.1.gz The link is not dangling, it points at a file in the julia package. > 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 1 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
