https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099166



--- Comment #20 from Martín Buenahora <martinbuenah...@openmailbox.org> ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #19)
> You could also "do the AUR way" and use a suffix, that means
> 'screenfetch-git' as a (temporary) package name, till there would be any
> main release at upstream. So there could be two packages (git and "official"
> release). Just as an idea, you're of course free to name your package as you
> prefer if the guidelines comply.
> 
> See also
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Non-
> Numeric_Version_in_Release

Well, the main reason for switching to git version was because the URL where I
was downloading the sources died, and the tar.gz downloaded from git have a
different name than the one in the URL, but now I know how to fix that. ¿It
would be better to stay in release version? Because I don't want to make a new
package for every commit...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to