https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134840
Antonio Trande <anto.tra...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) |
--- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande <anto.tra...@gmail.com> ---
> Also, Fedora Packaging Guidelines refers to a Python2 license
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Good_Licenses). Can we handle
> Python3 at same way?
python3 is packaged with a Python license so I think we can consider same
License tag to this package, too.
> I've asked the author about fixing the license link and including a copy of
> it. Anyway
You can include temporarily a separated License file waiting for upstream.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235
[Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
