https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226209
Vitezslav Crhonek <vcrho...@redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(vcrhonek@redhat.c |
|om) |
--- Comment #9 from Vitezslav Crhonek <vcrho...@redhat.com> ---
Sorry for (very) late response.
rpmlint:
./nut.spec:125: W: macro-in-comment %patch4
./nut.spec:131: W: macro-in-comment %patch10
./nut.spec:132: W: macro-in-comment %patch11
./nut.spec: W: patch-not-applied Patch4: nut-2.6.5-ipmifix.patch
Any reason to not apply Patch4?
Patches number 10 and 11 are not defined at all, removing comments with them
will do no harm.
./nut.spec:387: E: hardcoded-library-path in
/lib/systemd/system-shutdown/nutshutdown
Isn't it possible to use some rpm macro here?
nut-client.x86_64: W: one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig
nut-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/nutscan-ip.h
Just to let you know about it, really minor issues. Otherwise it looks fine,
IMO the review can be closed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
