https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155210
--- Comment #5 from Robin Lee <robinlee.s...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #4) > Huh? compat-drumstick is NOT the upstream name! The upstream name is just > drumstick. > > The "compat-" prefix was added to signal that it's an old version of > drumstick, to install in parallel with the current drumstick 1.x.x. And > there what I'm saying is that the drumstick0 naming scheme is more commonly > used for that kind of compatibility package in Fedora. The '0' being not the > soname soversion there, but the human-readable version number (drumstick > 0.x.x, the new Qt 5 one is 1.x.x). Actually naming as drumstick-qt4 or drumstick0 is OK for me. I would change the package name if you take the reviewer. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
