https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168299

Fabiano FidĂȘncio <fiden...@redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|---                         |NOTABUG
              Flags|needinfo?(fidencio@redhat.c |
                   |om)                         |
        Last Closed|                            |2014-11-27 10:24:28



--- Comment #2 from Fabiano FidĂȘncio <fiden...@redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Marc-Andre Lureau from comment #1)
> package looks good, builds ok, however I wonder if it makes sense to package
> this in mingw, since the package is the same content than regular non-mingw
> one.

After a small discussion on IRC with Marc-Andre, we agreed that would be better
for the maintainer to include whenever is necessary for its package directly
from the theme installed in the system.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to