https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168511
--- Comment #10 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala <huzai...@redhat.com> --- (In reply to Pekka Pietikäinen from comment #7) > I doubt anyone wants owl separately packaged, so to 100% comply with all > open source guidelines could just include owl in the src.rpm and build owl, > rebuild radamsa.c and then build that. > I or Niranjan can package owl separately, i am sure it will prove useful, otherwise as well :) > Or verify whether fedora blob exception magic could apply here and use > upstream radamsa.c like you did here :-) > > Radamsa git has a license file already, will poke to see whether a 0.3.1 or > so with it is possible (or if he's ready to release 0.4) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
