https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152247
--- Comment #6 from Michael Simacek <msima...@redhat.com> --- (In reply to Mo Morsi from comment #4) > Included the license file in the main package and marked as %doc (including > it in both would result in conflicts wouldn't it? If you use the %doc directive correctly, it certainly wouldn't as it installs it into directory named after the package. The correct usage would be not moving it in install - %doc paths are relative to the builddir (the directory where sources are unpacked), so it's unnecessary. So remove the mv line and just add: %doc LICENSE-2.0.txt to both %files sections and it should work. And I just noticed you have group tag in the javadoc subpackage, please remove it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
