https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
--- Comment #4 from Dave Love <d.l...@liverpool.ac.uk> --- (In reply to Vladimir Stackov from comment #3) > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25clean Yes, but I'm doing what the packaging guidelines say by using a template and rpmlint. This seems harmless and trivial in comparison to feedback I was hoping for before doing similar tools. > https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/411 > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ > Use_license_macro_in_RPMs_for_packages_in_Cloud_Image I can't tell what the status of that is, even. It's not in the guidelines, I haven't seen anything use it, and I don't understand what you gain by substituting the contents of the license tag somewhere. I want to include actual documents, which aren't necessarily just the GPL, or whatever. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
