https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171624
--- Comment #12 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.mich...@gmx.net> ---
Consider pointing the "fedora-review" at this ticket: fedora-review -b 1171624
It performs a lot of package review tests on the src.rpm and any built rpms and
presents a list of what other issues might be relevant.
> %files
> %doc ReadMe.md
> %license LICENSE
> %{_libdir}/*.so.*
>
> %files doc
> %doc ReadMe.md
> %license LICENSE
> %{_docdir}/%{name}/
Caution! %doc plus %_docdir inside the same spec file is non-trivial since
Fedora 20 and leads to duplication of files in subpackages:
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/338
> %files devel
> %{_libdir}/*.so
> %{_libdir}/cmake/%{name}/
> %{_includedir}/%{name}/
This would be a case of an "unowned directory" as hinted by Antonia in comment
8. You either need to include the directory %_libdir/cmake or "Requires: cmake"
to pull in the ownership from that package. If statismo-devel can be used
without CMake, including the directory is _okay_, see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#The_directory_is_owned_by_a_package_which_is_not_required_for_your_package_to_function
Also:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2014-December/010411.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
