Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612023 Martin Gieseking <martin.giesek...@uos.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org |martin.giesek...@uos.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Martin Gieseking <martin.giesek...@uos.de> 2010-07-13 03:08:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its > own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the > package > must be included in %doc. Yes, I know. But since "public domain" isn't a license, there's no license text that could be included. Thus, this part of the guidelines doesn't fit here. File debian/copyright is just a further %doc file like README or NEWS containing some information the user might be interested in. However, I leave it up to you to add it or not. I'll do the formal review later today because I'm pretty busy at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
