https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184040
Jaroslav Škarvada <jskar...@redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Jaroslav Škarvada <jskar...@redhat.com> --- I will sponsor you after we finish the review. Issues found: - SPEC file provided in comment 0 is different than SPEC file in SRPM, diff: @@ -33,5 +33,4 @@ %install -rm -rf %{buildroot} make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install @@ -41,4 +40,7 @@ %find_lang %{name} +%clean +rm -rf %{buildroot} + %files -f %{name}.lang %{_mandir}/man1/blivet-gui.1* - also please link the SPEC file directly (raw), not HTML. - checksums of archive included in SRPM and upstream archive are different: 6e5dd8581fb8b73c17bd0981cd367a18 blivet-gui-0.2.0.tar.gz 9ded8f2490c7561adbfe170bc4736262 blivet-gui-blivet-gui-0.2.0.tar.gz Also the provided source0 URL serves blivet-gui-blivet-gui-0.2.0.tar.gz, not blivet-gui-0.2.0.tar.gz. Fix the source0 URL or add workaround to SPEC, e.g.: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL?rd=Packaging/SourceURL#Troublesome_URLs - find_lang macro should be in %install section, not %check - desktop_file_validate should be also in %install section, please use the %check section only if there is working %check target in your makefile with useful built-time tests - in files section use macros, e.g. %{_datadir} for /usr/share, %{_bindir} for /usr/bin - you don't need to run 'rm -rf %{buildroot}' in %install section - your package must not own /usr/share/applications and /usr/share/polkit-1/actions directories, only own individual files/subdirs Minor, mostly cosmetic issues: - BuildRequires:intltool Please add space after colon to be consistent - Url: http://github.com/rhinstaller/blivet-gui Please rather use URL: (i.e. in capitals). Other: - Is the source code python 3 ready? In such case you should package it conditionally for python 3 (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python). If not, it's OK as is. - Source package should contains license text, as upstream please add it. - Directories /usr/share/help and /usr/share/help/C are not owned, but this is something you cannot resolve. AFAIK /usr/share/help is not in FHS standard. This should be provided by some package. Question is which package, gtk? gtk-doc? Any opinion? Bug should be filled against the identified package to include these directories. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review