https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182770
--- Comment #4 from Ken Dreyer <ktdre...@ktdreyer.com> --- Thanks Remi for the review comments. This backport was developed primarily for Ceph's RADOS Gateway software, and I don't think SetHandler was part of the design goals. I've opened a pull request to clarify this in the README. https://github.com/ceph/mod-proxy-fcgi/pull/2 The reason I hardcoded the "< 2.3" and the "= 20051115" and added a note in the %description was because I wanted it to be crystal clear to users that this package is only for httpd 2.2 / RHEL 6, and users shouldn't try to rebuild the SRPM for anything else. Maybe I was overly concerned about that. I've made the adjustments you've requested in the new version. * Mon Jan 26 2015 Ken Dreyer <kdre...@redhat.com> - 2.4.10-2 - Adjustments for package review (RHBZ #1182770) - Dynamically determine %%{_httpd_mmn} instead of hardcoding - Drop explicit requirement on httpd < 2.3 - Add a note to %%description regarding the lack of SetHandler support - Update .conf file to load the module by default Exact changes in Git: https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/ktdreyer/public_git/mod_proxy_fcgi.git/commit/?h=el6&id=6bd994d0c84697ffe02e8950e9bd31337e65e771 Spec URL: https://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/mod_proxy_fcgi.spec SRPM URL: https://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/mod_proxy_fcgi-2.4.10-2.el6.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
