https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182761

MartinKG <mgans...@alice.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #6 from MartinKG <mgans...@alice.de> ---
(In reply to Golo Fuchert from comment #5)
> Martin, the package is already in a very good shape. There is only one thing
> that has to be changed before including it in the repos:
> Surely you are aware of the latest changes to the Packaging Guidelines that
> the license files should not be included as %doc any longer, but as %license
> (see
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/
> LicensingGuidelines#License_Text). Please change that before pushing the
> package to the repos.

done
> Additionally, but that is only a matter of taste, I am not so happy with the
> frequent explicit mentioning of the package name in the spec file due to the
> mismatch of the package name and the source name. Maybe you want to consider
> introducing additional macro names.
done

@Golo Thanks for the review.


Spec URL:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/a5r0ymwnafz2xw6/vdr-weatherforecast.spec?dl=0
SRPM URL:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/6i3b0w5q8byz1sw/vdr-weatherforecast-0.0.2-2.fc21.src.rpm?dl=0

%changelog
* Mon Feb 02 2015 Martin Gansser <marti...@fedoraproject.org> - 0.0.2-2
- Mark license files as %%license where available
- Defined global macro pname for program name

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to