https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162234
--- Comment #19 from Giuseppe Paterno' <gpate...@gpaterno.com> --- Hello! For 1) I have to apologise as I forgot to sync with upstream fixes. In the new package I also moved to the new release schema that has been adopted upstream. The reason is 0600 as the securepass.conf contains the private keys to access the server. I want this to be secure by default, so that the sysadmin is forcing the read attribute only if he/she needs it for other applications. I think I fixed the other suggestions. Builds are ok on koji. New files: SPEC: https://gpaterno.fedorapeople.org/nss-securepass.spec SRPM: https://gpaterno.fedorapeople.org/nss-securepass-0.2-5.el6.src.rpm Thanks a lot! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
