https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190740
--- Comment #3 from Guido Grazioli <guido.grazi...@gmail.com> --- aargh; they did change groupId and artifactId so many times, even while i was maintaining both packages (they were optional dependencies of objenesis). Anyway, I think it would be better to go ahead with your two reviews, then obsolete the two older packages (I did not update for very long time and are outdated both for java packaging guidelines and release version) when your packages are deployed. About the naming, up to you. Maybe give a peek at how the naming/obsolete/provide thing was handled at the time all the jakarta-* packages were renamed to apache-* -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
