https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198246
--- Comment #7 from Carlos (Morel-Riquelme) <idd...@gmail.com> --- Thank Paulo, here are my answers 1) i use oflb prefix cuz the font is is published as "open font library" and parag recommend this. 2) the version of package is equal to the metadata in the font, in my first revision my version was 0.1 or 1 , but parag tell me that is god idea respect the metadata in the font. so i just run ttname -a coval.otf 3) parag recommend use 63, now i can't remember the wiki link with the info, sorry 4)thank for the suggestion 5) Now i nned lear about fedora review and how make a good reviews of other packages 6) Also run appstream-util over the font.xml, but i add to the buildrequire appdata-tools Thank Paulo :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
