Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510864 --- Comment #8 from manuel wolfshant <wo...@nobugconsulting.ro> 2010-07-17 08:52:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Manuel, do you think I shoulkd place > http://web.archive.org/web/20040604132106/http://colorize.raszi.hu/downloads/colorize_0.3.4.tar.bz2 > in Source0? To be honest, I would not do that because no one knows how long will archive.org preserve anything AND they are not the actual upstream. I would at most add a comment refering to the archive web site. Now, looking again over Jason's comment, I think that preserving the original (and now useless ) URL is not a good idea. I suggest to comment it and mention that the original site no longer exists. >What it imported from PLD repository already mentioned in first line of >changelog entry. And all old entries removed by your suggestion. In my opinion all the comments from the first entry of the changelog could be removed. Just make it: - Initial version, based on ftp://ftp.icm.edu.pl/vol/rzm1/linux-pld-linux/dists/3.0/PLD/SRPMS/RPMS/colorize-0.3.4-1.src.rpm - Add Russian summary and description That's all that one might care for when looking at the Fedora package. If they are really interested in the changes towards the PLD version, they can download the PLD one and compare. As user of the package, I could not care less about the state of the original PLD package. > Branches: F-12 F-13 EL-5 EL-6 Thank you for asking for EPEL branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
