https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210753

Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group) <bugs.mich...@gmx.net> 
changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
         Resolution|NEXTRELEASE                 |---
           Keywords|                            |Reopened



--- Comment #13 from Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group) 
<bugs.mich...@gmx.net> ---
> It's already packaged and submitted.

I've given feedback during its updates-testing period, which was soon enough.
You choose to ignore that feedback. Not nice, and dilettantish. :/

You simply could have replaced the build in the bodhi ticket.


> See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210754#c10

Irrelevant. Either you've misunderstood this, or you refer to something
different.

spdlog builds a useless base package. It should build just spdlog-devel. That's
what other similar packages do, too.

Now, if you want to fix it, you would need to follow:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_Existing_Packages

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to