https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015868
Raphael Groner <projects...@smart.ms> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|tchollingswo...@gmail.com |projects...@smart.ms
Flags| |needinfo?(tchollingsworth@g
| |mail.com)
--- Comment #12 from Raphael Groner <projects...@smart.ms> ---
The %license line is required for any new spec file. If there's no license
text, request one from upstream or suggest a standard text for the license
upstream is claiming.
Would you mind to rename the package to just "qutepart" and remove the python
prefix from name? If so, you can get rid of the project macro and please use
%{name} consistently, also for the %files section.
Really do not know why python is needed in the name cause the package installs
a standalone application, not a library or the like. Are you planning to do a
parallel python3 build where applicable (currently not possible for EPEL)?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Avoiding_collisions_between_the_python_2_and_python_3_stacks
Original reviewer: Would you continue the official review or should I take over
to finish with the official fedora-review run?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
