https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208833
--- Comment #9 from Alexander Ploumistos <alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #8) > We package per family fonts. See > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming page. So all > other fonts need to be packaged as separate fonts and they will provide > their own metainfo file. Just check all those 3 fonts have no common family > name all are different. The thing is that upstream does not follow typographic conventions, so even though these fonts *should* be in the same family, they are not. You have seen the structure of his web page; there is some sort of grouping that sometimes makes sense, others not so much. On the other hand, he ships Alexander and several others in the TextFonts package, so at some point we could have gdouros-textfonts-alexander-fonts and such. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
