https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198342
--- Comment #34 from Matthew Miller <mat...@redhat.com> --- Ralf, I believe the current naming to be compliant. Specifically, this is a upstream post-release package with a "properly ordered simple version", and the guidelines say * Properly ordered simple versions. These are usually due to quick bugfix releases, such as openssl-0.9.6b or gkrellm-2.1.7a. As new versions come out, the non-numeric tag is properly incremented (e.g. openssl-0.9.6c) or the numeric version is increased and the non-numeric tag is dropped (openssl-0.9.7). In this case, the non-numeric characters are permitted in the Version: field. I also expect this to be a moot point very shortly, whenever upstream 0.3.3 is released. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
