https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223627



--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo <punto...@libero.it> ---
NON blocking ISSUES:

[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated". 6 files have unknown license. Detailed
     output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1223627-gap-pkg-edim/srpm/review-
     gap-pkg-edim/licensecheck.txt
   MPLv1.1: edim/doc/mathml.css
license field should changed in: GPLv2+ and MPLv1.1
gap-pkg-edim.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/licenses/gap-pkg-edim/GPL
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#incorrect-fsf-address
Please, report this problem to upstream

minor issues:
gap-pkg-edim.i686: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/lib/gap/pkg/edim/doc/edim.bib
gap-pkg-edim.i686: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/lib/gap/pkg/edim/doc/edim.bbl

Please, fix before import

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to