https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226557
--- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group)
<bugs.mich...@gmx.net> ---
Just a quick comment:
> all packages that provide a dssi plugin are named like %{name}-dssi.
Likely those packages predate the %parent-%child naming guidelines and have not
been renamed.
Technically, these plugins are based on the DSSI Plugin API -- they all install
into %{_libdir}/dssi/ -- and therefore can be seen as add-ons to the "dssi"
package. Like LADSPA, where all LADSPA based plugins begin with "ladspa-":
$ dnf -q list \*ladspa |grep -v ^Avail|wc -l
1
$ dnf -q list ladspa\* |grep -v ^Avail|wc -l
17
There's also packages named
dssi-calf-plugins : subpackage of "calf" -> review bug 492974 from 2009
dssi-vst
dssi-vst-wine
which follow the %parent-%child naming scheme.
Yes, sometimes this is not easy, and packagers/reviewers have come up with what
they found plausible during review. Possibly years ago.
Reading up on DSSI, it is said at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disposable_Soft_Synth_Interface
that it is old and that LV2 is considered a successor that reunites DSSI and
LADSPA.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
