https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228865



--- Comment #6 from Alexander Ploumistos <alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> ---
Thank you for taking the time to review this.

Source rpm and spec file updated.

(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #5)
> Where is the license specified?

There never was a license file. See here, bottom of the page:

https://web.archive.org/web/20150625020428/http://users.teilar.gr/~g1951d/

> %description seems to contain a private use unicode character (1480󿀄
> 1561).

Thanks, there was a funny-looking zero, I fixed it in both the spec file and
the metainfo.xml file. By the way, which tool picked that up?

> [ ]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
>      Note: %defattr present but not needed

But I don't have a %defattr directive, where is this coming from?

> [ ]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
>      (~1MB) or number of files.
>      Note: Documentation size is 808960 bytes in 1 files.
> That's borderline. A bit too small to create a separate package.

See comments 1 & 4 here:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208842

> Appdata file should be validated in %check
> [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AppData].

Does this apply to metainfo.xml files? I thought it was just for the
appdata.xml ones.

> $ appstream-util validate-relax
> /usr/share/appdata/gdouros-anaktoria.metainfo.xml
> /usr/share/appdata/gdouros-anaktoria.metainfo.xml: FAILED:
> • markup-invalid        : <id> does not have correct extension for kind
> • tag-missing           : <extends> is not present
> Validation of files failed

On an F22 system, I'm getting this:
$ appstream-util validate-relax rpmbuild/SOURCES/gdouros-anaktoria.metainfo.xml 
rpmbuild/SOURCES/gdouros-anaktoria.metainfo.xml: OK

I can't understand why there would be a problem with the id tag or why the
extends tag would be needed, it does not extend anything.

On what system did you run fedora-review?

I've just noticed that fedora-review on this system creates an F21 package even
though I fed it an F23 source rpm built in mock, is there a setting someplace
that I've missed?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to