Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618451 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcall...@redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcall...@redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcall...@redhat.com> 2010-07-27 11:02:12 EDT --- The license tag should be: License: LGPLv2+ and Python Also, you're using mixed macros ($RPM_BUILD_ROOT vs %{buildroot}). I would suggest that you standardize on the latter. I'm a little concerned about the forced dependency on /usr/lib/debug/lib*/ld-2.11.2.so.debug, as technically, the package that provides it (glibc-debuginfo) is not part of the normal repositories, so this package will not be installable without the user consciously enabling the debuginfo repo. Perhaps a cleaner approach would be for the command to check on invocation for presence of that library, and if not found, prompt the user to run the appropriate "debuginfo-install" command, similar to gdb's behavior when it hits missing debuginfo during a debug run. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
