https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043305



--- Comment #14 from Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group) 
<bugs.mich...@gmx.net> ---
I don't understanding the packaging applied here:

epix requires epix-static (which is a virtual package in epix-devel)
epix-devel requires epix
=> a circular dependency between epix and epix-devel

If headers and static lib are strictly required at _runtime_, it would have
been more elegant to include everything in a single package. Just like it's
done for compilers and similar tools.

What does it do with the static lib and the headers at runtime?

[...]

On x86_64, "dnf install epix.i686" and "dnf install epix" differ. The former
pulls in epix.x86_64 - possibly because of a broken dep somewhere.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to