https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246846
--- Comment #7 from Jonny Heggheim <heg...@gmail.com> --- Would it make sense to change the license to reflect each package? $ diff -U 1 jmh.spec jmh-jonny.spec --- jmh.spec 2015-08-29 15:17:43.000000000 +0200 +++ jmh-jonny.spec 2015-08-29 17:41:32.230865881 +0200 @@ -7,3 +7,3 @@ # 2 files have unknown license, reported @ http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jmh-dev/2015-August/002037.html -License: BSD and GPLv2 with exceptions +License: GPLv2 with exceptions URL: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/code-tools/jmh/ @@ -75,2 +75,3 @@ Summary: JMH Samples +License: BSD $ rpm -qp --queryformat '%{NAME}: %{LICENSE}\n' jmh-*.noarch.rpm jmh: GPLv2 with exceptions jmh-core-benchmarks: GPLv2 with exceptions jmh-core-ct: GPLv2 with exceptions jmh-core-it: GPLv2 with exceptions jmh-generator-annprocess: GPLv2 with exceptions jmh-generator-asm: GPLv2 with exceptions jmh-generator-bytecode: GPLv2 with exceptions jmh-generator-reflection: GPLv2 with exceptions jmh-javadoc: GPLv2 with exceptions jmh-parent: GPLv2 with exceptions jmh-samples: BSD -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
