https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265885

Michel Alexandre Salim <mic...@michel-slm.name> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|needinfo?(michel@michel-slm |
                   |.name)                      |



--- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim <mic...@michel-slm.name> ---
(In reply to Jackson Isaac from comment #2)
> In Source0 is the '#/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz' (Git tag) necessary ? The
> release tarball and url with tag link/points to the same file. 
> 
Yes. You can try doing spectool -gf on the spec file without the
#/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz -- you'll get v%{version}.tar.gz as the file name.
They do not point to the same file. There's a mailing list discussion about
this (how best to get properly-named source tarballs out of Github).

> There are few issues related to licensing and 3rd party libraries being
> included in the source.
> 
I don't think there's an issue with licensing (apart from needing to update the
license info), but inclusion of 3rd party lib is indeed bad, let me see if I
can build zeal against the upstream libqxt instead.

> I tried running zeal and clicked on open url but nothing opened up. I don't
> know if that if the desired behavior or I did something wrong.
> 
Hmm, what Open URL? You need to go to File->Options, switch to the Docsets tab
and install something.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to