Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601577 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) <pa...@hubbitus.info> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #11 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) <pa...@hubbitus.info> 2010-08-03 09:22:50 EDT --- If we don't known exact license, I think we should use most restrictive, in our case GPLv2+. If you are doubt, you can fire FELegal flag to get clarification from Spot. /usr/lib/liblockfile.so (without number) is devel file and must go to the appropriate sub-package. Hm, now I see Library, occasionally it did not produced in Fedora 11, where I did try it build before. New package even not build. On Fedora 13 build fine. Compilation done with command: gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i686 -mtune=atom -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -Wall -D_GNU_SOURCE -I. -DLIB -DLOCKPROG=\"/usr/bin/dotlockfile\" \ -c lockfile.c As you can see there no -fPIC flag. You have choose patch make scripts (and set it upstream), or try add it to CFLAGS environment with comment. Libs and devel sub-packages should require versioned main package. I also do not understand error no-ldconfig-symlink :( . I try ask friends. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
