https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277505
--- Comment #14 from gil cattaneo <punto...@libero.it> --- (In reply to Damian Wrobel from comment #13) > (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #10) > > instead of maven-local you should use javapackages-local > > > Gil, thanks for your hints, I started to look at them and compare with > packaging guidelines [1] and I found that e.g. [1] clearly states the > following: > > "Java packages MUST BuildRequire their respective build system: > > BuildRequires: maven-local for packages built with Maven" > > and there is no single reference that javapackages-local can be used as a > substitute for maven-local in this case. Only if the package provide a pom.xml file and use that for build the package in this case you use only java-devel. javapackages-local is enough > So is there any specification on top of it which overwrites this or I > misunderstood or missed something? > > [1]. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#BuildRequires_and_Requires see also https://fedorahosted.org/released/javapackages/doc/#_generic_java_builds regards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
