https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288453
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |POST
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> ---
(In reply to Julien Enselme from comment #4)
> > You can avoid defining %sum. Just put the summary in the first Summary, and
> > then use %summary in subsequent subpackages.
>
> I didn't know that. Is there something similar for description?
Nope.
> > PYTHONPATH is normally unset, so you don't need to preserve the previous
> > one.
>
> It's more an habit to preserve it, but I agree it is not useful.
>
> > You probably don't need to use sed to fix the shebang line. Just move
> %py2_install below %py3_install.
>
> Should the binary use python3 by default? It works, I tested it. That's why
> I put %py3_install last and corrected the shebang.
Oh, OK. Yes, python3 is preferred
[https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Executables_in_.2Fusr.2Fbin].
> * Sat Dec 5 2015 Julien Enselme <juj...@jujens.eu> - 0.5.4-3
> - Use only one doc package.
> - Use %%summary to avoid summary repetition.
> - Use %%__python3 macro to fix shebang.
>
>
> SPEC: http://dl.jujens.eu/SPECS/python-CommonMark.spec
> SRPM: http://dl.jujens.eu/SRPMS/python-CommonMark-0.5.4-3.fc23.src.rpm
- license is OK
- license file is present, %license is used
- latest version
- builds and installs OK
- new python template is used
- python3 is preferred
- requires and provides are OK
- no scriptlets present or needed
- rpmlint says: no-documentation, no-manual-page-for-binary, spelling-error,
python-bytecode-without-source. All false positives or ignorable.
You might want to add Suggests: python-CommonMark-doc to the python2- and
python3- subpackages.
Package is APPROVED.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
