https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288759
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |zbys...@in.waw.pl
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org |zbys...@in.waw.pl
Flags| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> ---
The description is nice, but a bit too high-level ;). Please add a bit of
down-to-earth stuff like "this package can be used to ...".
Where is it specified that the license is GPLv3+ (and and GPLv3)?
python2-commit.i686: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
That's because the spec in srpm is different than the standalone version. The
standalone version is OK.
python2-commit.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/commit/operator/operator_c.c
python2-commit.i686: E: wrong-script-interpreter
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/commit/operator/operator.pyx python
python2-commit.i686: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/commit/operator/operator.pyx 644 python
Those appear to be source files that should be removed from the binary package.
What about the documentation? The documentation is nice, but maybe it's good
enough if people can access it online.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
