https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100



--- Comment #12 from Roman Tsisyk <ro...@tsisyk.com> ---
>  $ rpmdev-bumpspec -V test.spec

It works for me:

--------
VERSION=$(sed -n 's/^\([0-9\.]*\)-\([0-9]*\).*/\1\.\2/p' VERSION)
rpmdev-bumpspec fedora.spec -n ${VERSION} -c "automated build" 

-Version: 1.6.8.0
+Version: 1.6.8.285
 Release: 1%{?dist}

 %changelog
+* Sun Jan 03 2016 Roman Tsisyk <ro...@tarantool.org> - 1.6.8.285-1
+- automated build
+
--------

Thank you for the advice!

> Releases start at 1, however.  The 0 is for pre-releases and remains 
> untouched even during updates, since it's a prefix, and the number right of 
> it would be increased as long as a pre-release is packaged:

Fixed.

> However, the dash in  ${major}.${major}.${minor}-${patch}  is arbitrary and 
> could also be replaced with a dot.

${major}.${major}.${minor}.${patch} is good scheme. dash is not mandatory at
all. 
Luckily, we already use such naming scheme for our Fedora/CentOS repositories
on tarantool.org:
http://tarantool.org/dist/1.6/fedora/rawhide/x86_64/Packages/
http://tarantool.org/dist/1.6/centos/7/os/x86_64/Packages/
I think we can go with the solution.

> If I were you, I would ask about that on packaging@ list. Perhaps there's a 
> way to disable stripping while keeping the -debuginfo package generation. 
> Without -debuginfo packages you lose features like ABRT based backtrace 
> generation and problem reports: https://fedoraproject.org

I've sent an email about stripping to packing@

Spec URL:
https://gist.githubusercontent.com/rtsisyk/8a8d2dcae143d0699e76/raw/5e0c995bd837c625de08c0b59a3aa2b8a195ca7f/tarantool_1.6.8.285.spec
SRPM URL:
https://gist.github.com/rtsisyk/8a8d2dcae143d0699e76/raw/5e0c995bd837c625de08c0b59a3aa2b8a195ca7f/tarantool-1.6.8.285-1.fc24.src.rpm
Buildbot: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12389392

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to