https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289726
Ville Skyttä <ville.sky...@iki.fi> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |ville.sky...@iki.fi
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org |ville.sky...@iki.fi
Flags| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Ville Skyttä <ville.sky...@iki.fi> ---
All *.txt are installed as executable.
All summaries are quite weak, they pretty much just repeat the package's name.
Most subpackage descriptions have the same issue as the summaries.
Are the test failures somehow expected and safe to just ignore? Upstream issue
tracker or discussion reference?
Javadocs crosslink with online Java SE 6 javadocs. Would be better to crosslink
with local java-javadoc. Ditto crosslinking with dependencies' javadocs, at
least ant-javadoc and objectweb-asm-javadoc seem to be applicable ones, and
there are probably more.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
