https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295115
--- Comment #13 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.mich...@gmx.net> --- > Release is usually just an integer (i.e. 1 instead of 0.1) Generally, that's not true, since you seem to forget the pre-release guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages And if this package really is a snapshot, there are specific guidelines for snapshots, too: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages > %setup -q -T -D -a 1 > %setup -q -T -D -a 2 > %setup -q -T -D -a 3 > %setup -q -T -D -a 4 > %setup -q -T -D -a 5 > %setup -q -T -D -a 6 > %setup -q -T -D -a 7 > %setup -q -T -D -a 8 > %setup -q -T -D -a 9 > %setup -q -T -D -a 10 Isn't it possibly anymore to specify -a multiple times in a single %setup invocation? > %post -p /sbin/ldconfig > > %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig Why is ldconfig run for the base package, although the package does not store any libs in runtime linker's search path? > %files lldb > %{_libdir}/liblldb.so* This subpackage wants to run ldconfig in its scriptlets. > %{_libdir}/swift/pm/* Lots of so-called "unowned directories" created by this package. Kindly review the following pages https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories and carefully examine directory ownership of all [sub-]packages. > %doc %{_mandir}/man1/swift.1.gz > %doc %{_datarootdir}/doc/swift/* %_datarootdir/doc = %_datadir/doc = %_docdir And both %_docdir as well as %_mandir is a path where files implicitly are marked as %doc, because it's in the %__docdir_path list. See: rpm -E %__docdir_path -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
