https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334
--- Comment #5 from Mukundan Ragavan <nonamed...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to José Matos from comment #4) > (In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #1) > > > > - Package have the default element marked as %%doc :DESCRIPTION > > > > ---> I don't see where this is. DESCRIPTION is *NOT* marked as %doc in the > > spec file ... > > As Mattias said DESCRIPTION should not be marked as documentation because it > possible to install a package without documentation (passing --excludedocs > while installing with rpm) while that file is required for the R package to > be properly installed. > > That was the rationale for excluding the DESCRIPTION file from %doc. I did *not* want it to be labeled as %doc. What I meant to say was "fedora-review warning was bogus". It was clear to me when I wrote that comment. But, as I read it now, I realize how it sounds! :( -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
