https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305655
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry Mikhirev <mikhi...@gmail.com> --- > You should also add > Provides: bundled(boost-endian) > Provides: bundles(portable-archive) > I don't think it'll make any practical difference, but the guidelines require > > that [1], and there's no reason not to. I'm sorry, but I don't understand why сan it be needed. That are forks of original libraries maintained by liblsl developers. The guideline you pointed to requires the version of bundled library to be defined, but the code is not identical to any upstream release. Then, as I mentioned before, both endian and portable_archive are header-only libraries, so the binary package does not bundle shared libs, it does not even contain files linked to some bundled libs statically, only generated template specializations are used. If the point of defining provides is to mark possibly duplicated binary files, there's no duplication. If it is to provide a way to track security issues, it will not work, because the code is not equal to upstream and its version can't be determined. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
