https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317592

Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #2 from Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> ---
Thx for the upstream query about the separate license file. Here is one minor
nit:

* Test suite
  - If you are going to expand the test suite in %prep section, you should use
    %setup macro together with -a or -b parameter for that [1].
  - Nevertheless, the safer option is to expand the test suite in the %check
    section. This way you will avoid possible pollution of the rebuilt gem and
    the necessity to copy the test suite.
  - You don't really need to delete the test suite after execution, unless you
    insist on using rpmbuild directly (in that case, I can imagine it might
    cause some issues)


Otherwise the package looks sane => APPROVED

I am also going to sponsor you now, so please follow with the next steps [2].
But please consider fixing the issues I pointed out above prior importing the
package into Fedora.



[1] http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-inside-macros.html
[2]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Add_Package_to_Source_Code_Management_.28SCM.29_system_and_Set_Owner

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to