Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549 --- Comment #25 from Fabian Affolter <fab...@bernewireless.net> 2010-09-01 06:19:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > (In reply to comment #23) > > At the moment there is an issue with the 'Wizard' because 'Maemo Mapper' is > > not > > available. > > Hm, I don't really understand the upstream development strategy. It's also > strange that they don't provide source tarballs at a prominent place (maybe we > picked the wrong tarball to build this package). A lot of source tarballs are hosted at http://repository.maemo.org/ and others are available at their development web space. The Maemo community is very similar to the OLPC/Sugar group. A lot of websites, wikis, bugtrackers, and ftp servers...it's hard to overview. > Fabian, could you please contact the developer and clarify what happened to > the > "Maemo Mapper", and how to get a working Linux version of osm2go? 'Maemo Mapper' is used by the wizard to get the mapping area and an independent project. osm2go is working without 'Maemo Mapper' functionality but is not that comfortable. I think that I will make a patch to remove the 'Maemo Mapper' option/requirement from the wizard. > I think we shouldn't add the package to Fedora with broken functionality. The functionality is not broken, it's just not working ;-). I agree that at the moment we shouldn't add the package to the Package Collection but when the 'Maemo Mapper' option is gone, we can reconsider our point of view. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
