https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
--- Comment #4 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <domi...@greysector.net> --- (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #1) > Can you use the name pseudoroot for package and binary? I think pseudo is a > too generic name and pseudoroot would be in conjunction with fakeroot what > does similiar things. Makes sense. I'll ask upstream. > There's an alternative and some binary/script fakeroot-pseudo, is it a plugin? This is actually a drop-in replacement for fakeroot. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
