https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047
--- Comment #7 from l...@us.ibm.com ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #6)
> > Given that there are 95 executables under the %{_bindir} in this case, do
> > we still want to explicitlly list all files?
>
> In this case %{_bindir}/tss* would be a reasonable compromise.
> And there's only two files in %{_libdir}/, so they should be listed
> explicitly:
>
> %files
> %{_bindir}/tss*
> %{_libdir}/libtss.so.0
> %{_libdir}/libtss.so.0.*
>
> As an additional advantage, this protects against accidental so version
> bumps (which are forbidden in stable releases).
That makes perfect sense. Thank you!
Vicky
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
