https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367033



--- Comment #26 from Mosaab Alzoubi <moc...@hotmail.com> ---
- Package could be pass by this way but I suggest that fixing make mechanism
and using them because upstream has tests , so try to include tests in %%check
unit .. 

- Don't forget to clean spec from unneeded comments .

- Also never mind for group tag :)

-------

> no, this is not an option, their make do not respect env like 
> CFLAGS="%{optflags}" and it produce statically linked binary.

You can fix make file as you want :) by sed or any way.

-------

* Name: ... OK
* Rpmlint: o errors ... OK
* License: MIT ... OK
* Binaries: None ... OK
- Spec: see notes above
* Content: Clean ... OK
- %check test: see notes above
* Upstream CHECKSUM(MD5) this package: cc910402302810b750858e5bb2a5433e
 CHECKSUM(MD5) upstream package: cc910402302810b750858e5bb2a5433e ... OK

-------

I'm waking for late hour of this night , just mention me any time to mark this
as approved after processing the notes.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to